|
|
|
|
|
if the software that you have downloaded on Tetraedre's web site is not
working correctly, be sure that you have the latest version before sending
questions or comments.
I have been using your serial communication code for some time and recently I have been facing a problem. I have not been successful in connecting to ports that are above 9 (com10, com11,...). I always get a error = 8. I tested the port on Hyper Terminal and it works. Have you seen this before? Can you help me?
Try "\\\\.\\COM10" or "\\.\COM10" (depends from your programming language)
we are trying to get a string from the serial port.
With serial2 demo we get a single byte
How can we get a string with a length of 40 char ?
You can set Rx size (setRxSize()) to 40. But I strongly discourage
this since your application might be stuck waiting for incoming
data (what happen if you receive 39 bytes (1 byte lost) followed by
40 bytes ???)
You should always set Rx size at 1, create a reception buffer and
fill it we incoming data. So, you can handle erroneous frames as
they arrive.
When I try to compile I get the following error:
Borland C++ 5.6.4 for Win32 Copyright (c) 1993, 2002 Borland ..\wcallerid\resources\ns\tserial_event.cpp: "tserial_event.cpp": E2268 Call to undefined function '_beginthreadex' in function Tserial_event::connect(char *,int,int,char,bool) at line 294
When you write borland projects, you can choose between
single-threaded and multi-threaded library
_beginthreadex is only available in multi-threaded library
This is really not well done in Borland. Either you can
find the right option in you project, otherwise you need
to edit the .bpr file manually.
There is an option -tWM Try to replace it with -tWM-
Replace also cw32.lib with cw32mt.lib
I hope this will solve your problems
I have device that works with Hyperterminal, but I cannot make it work with your library. Any idea ?
This is a problem of serial port configuration. I have modified the library on May 16th 2005 to
solve this problem.
In details here is what is happening:
In version prior to 2005-05-16, we had, in Tserial_event.cpp
dcb.fDtrControl = DTR_CONTROL_DISABLE; dcb.fRtsControl = RTS_CONTROL_DISABLE;This means that we don't use hardware handshake and we disable the DTR and RTS lines. This was not very wise since some devices, don't work if DTR and RTS are disabled even if they don't use hardware handshake (for example a modem, will disconnect from the phone line when these lines go low)
dcb.fDtrControl = DTR_CONTROL_ENABLE; dcb.fRtsControl = RTS_CONTROL_ENABLE;This means that we don't use hardware handshake and we enable the DTR and RTS lines. If you want hardware handshake, set the hard_handshake to true. This will set
dcb.fDtrControl = DTR_CONTROL_HANDSHAKE; dcb.fRtsControl = RTS_CONTROL_HANDSHAKE;
The OnCharSent() function seems to be CERTAIN that it is called
once for every byte that is sent, no more no less. Is this true?
And most imortant, is It so as well with the OnCharArrival ?
The serial event module was written to simulate microcontrollers
on Win32. Windows hides a certain number of features so that you can access
to the serial port like any other file. This is not what I needed for my
application.
So, the OnCharArrival callback function represents the interrupt call
that occurs on microcontroller when the input buffer is full. In a similar
way, the OnCharSent callback function represents the interrupt call when
the output buffer is empty.
To implement that on Windows, I've used two methods that both used the
OVERLAPPED reading and writing functions:
For the OnCharArrival, I perform a permanent non-blocking read
of a single byte (line 445)
success = (char) ReadFile(serial_handle,&data,1,&read_nbr,&ovReader);
success = (char) WriteFile(serial_handle, &data_to_send, 1, &result_nbr, &ovWriter);
I am trying to test your event-driven serial port program
(April 29th 2001 version) in MFC. When I click a button on a ialog, several
bytes are sent to serial port. There is a loop plug on the serial port
of my computer. So the bytes are feed back at once and displayed in the
dialog. I find that when I click the button, only the last one byte can
be received and displayed in the dialog.
...
I also notice that the "tx_in_progress" variable is only set but not
checked in your program. This variable indicates whether the current byte
is sent out. Why don't you check it in your program? I changed the above
function to this:
void Tserial_event::sendChar (char data) { do { } while (tx_in_progress); tx_in_progress = 1; data_to_send = data; SetSignal(SIG_DATA_IN); }
The event driven program must be used completely in an event
driven manner. For instance, you should never send a byte until the OnCharSent
event occurs. In your application, you should not allow the user to send
another byte (by clicking) until the previous byte hsa been sent.
As you have seen, there is not output buffer. This is a known limitation.
You have to implement it into your software by using the OnCharSent event.
This is not too complicated. Anyway, if you need
a high throughput, you should consider rewriting some parts of the code
so that you can send a complete buffer and not only byte after byte. The
software I presented was in fact used primarly to simulate small microcontrollers
which doesn't have complex output buffer and which are byte oriented.
Another point is regarding the extra code you have added: DO NEVER EVER
PUT A BUSY LOOP IN YOUR EVENT DRIVEN APPLICATION !!!!!!!
What you are doing with the while loop is in fact waiting for the CharSent
event. I know that writting software that are really event driven is sometimes
painful but this is the price to pay. So you application will never block
anymore.
I am wondering what this ByteSize is used for !
The ByteSize is used to define if 7-bit or 8-bit data must
be transmitted on the serial line. In the RS-232 specification you can
send 5,6, 7 or 8-bit data words. I've added this feature to the Tserial_event.cpp
code because I used it on an application here
it was required to send 7-bit data.
I am new to Visual C++, trying to compile the serial communication
project under Microsoft Visual C++ is killing me. Can you kindly provide
a VC++6.0 project file for this sample program ?
The project was originally created to be compiled with the
Borland C++ Builder development environment. In order to permit compilation
with Microsoft's Visual C++, I've modified a little the source code. A
"#ifdef __BORLANDC__" has been inserted in the header part of the sertest.cpp
and sertest2.cpp files in order to skip some Borland's specific
pre-compiler commands.
IMPORTANT
But more important. The event-driven application uses multithreading
in order to generate the events. So Visual C++ projects that use multithreading
must be compiled with the appropriate setting. In your project settings,
you MUST choose the multithreaded run-time library, otherwise the programme
will not compile
Project settings | *--- C/C++ | *--- Code generation | *---- Use run-time library | *---- Multithreaded
I need to create a simple program to connect to an external
device at 10400 bps (about 1/11th of the maximum 115200 speed of my 16550
UART) through my COM port. I've just downloaded all your very well documented
routines from zdnet but I cannot understand whether I can set any baud
rate or just the standard ones (9600, 19200, ecc.). Could you give me any
suggestion ?
The technical document of Microsoft indicates the following:
BaudRate
re>Specifies the baud rate at which the communications device
operates. This member can be an actual baud rate value,
or one of the following baud rate indexes:
CBR_110, CBR_19200,
CBR_300, CBR_38400,
CBR_600, CBR_56000,
CBR_1200, CBR_57600,
CBR_2400, CBR_115200,
CBR_4800, CBR_128000,
CBR_9600, CBR_256000,
CBR_14400.
This doesn't tell if it will work with 10400. I've never tried with "exotic"
values. You should try and tell us if it works. Anyway, before doing that
you could check if the UART chip can work at such frequency. To do that,
you must make the calculation of the division ratio for the UART's baudrate
generator. Check the site www.beyondlogic.org
for more information about the UART chip.